[CinCV TNG] 5.1 updated tarballs and packages available.

Einar R√ľnkaru einarrunkaru at gmail.com
Sat Dec 3 20:32:24 CET 2016

On 12/03/2016 07:33 PM, Terje J. Hanssen wrote:
> Den 01. des. 2016 16:31, skrev Danny Schmarsel:
>> In my opinion, Cinelerra 5 is mature enough to be displayed right next
>> to Cinelerra-CV on the download page. CV may be stable, but it's
>> outdated in many aspects (especially the limited file formats).
>> I'm thinking about adding a selection a user has to make when he first
>> visits the download page:
>> "Which version of Cinelerra do you want?"
>> CV | HV | 5.1 | 6
> I would vote for "CV | 5.1"

First we need to find a name for the gg branch. It is not nice to have 
branch name vs version name. I prpose to to call the other fork 'GG' and 
drop 'five' from all references. Version numbers tend to change.
> And suggest to make it as quick and easy for users get an overview of
> the two versions and download packages (developers always find more as
> needed). Possibly a short description of each version beside the Feature
> comparison chart (imo available formats are important).

Terje, write a draft. I expect comparision from an user who really uses 
both forks.


More information about the Cinelerra mailing list